For IP professionals
This is the portal for professionals working in the field of intellectual property. Here you'll find direct access to all necessary resources.
- Trade Mark Database
- Register changes for trade marks
- Madrid Monitor
- International trade mark registration
- Trade Mark Guidelines (German, French, Italian)
- Classification tool for trade marks
- Trade mark examination support tool
- Trade marks: Costs and fees
- Trade marks: WIPO fee calculator
- Cancellation procedure for trade marks on the grounds of non-use
- Protected public signs: Abbreviations
- Protected public signs: Other signs (emblems)
- Directory of Intellectual Property Offices
- Trade marks: News Service Archive
- Patents: Patent Examination Guidelines (German, French)
- Patents: Fees
The measures introduced to combat “Swissness” misuse yield results
Successful measures in the fight against misuse of “Swissness” and fewer offences in Switzerland. The Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IPI) reports a positive result for the year 2018.
The key points at a glance:
- In 2018, the IPI did not have to initiate any criminal proceedings in Switzerland. In the 78 interventions led by the IPI, all of the companies involved were cooperative.
- Bilateral dialogue by the IPI is proving to be particularly effective in China, where the IPI only had to intervene in 34 cases.
“Swissness” is a national and international bestseller. The indication of Swiss origin instils trust in consumers as it stands for reliability and premium international quality. Many producers benefit from this advantage. However, not all do this lawfully, as the success of the “Switzerland” brand attracts a high number of free riders. In collaboration with the business community, the IPI combats misuse of indications such as Made in Switzerland, the Swiss cross and the Swiss coat of arms. The business community and the authorities share a common, long-term goal of achieving a high level of acceptance of the “Switzerland” brand both at home and abroad. This allows companies to continue to effectively utilise the competitive advantage that “Swissness” offers.
A good report for “Swissness” in Switzerland
In Switzerland, the IPI issued warnings to companies in 78 cases (previous year: 86) for infringements such as the use of a Swiss cross on an imported product. The companies concerned were cooperative. When the IPI intervened, they made the necessary changes relating to the use of the Swiss indication of source. This meant that the IPI did not have to implement stronger measures such as seizing goods at customs, civil actions or criminal prosecution. Emphasis is placed first and foremost on constructive and pragmatic solutions. For example, a manufacturer who wrongfully used the Swiss coat of arms on packaging had to commit to changing the packaging with immediate effect. However, he was allowed to sell the remaining stock.
Dialogue with China bears fruit
The measures that can be implemented in Switzerland to combat misuse are not applicable abroad. This makes it particularly difficult to enforce the protection of “Swissness”. For this reason, the IPI monitors the national trade mark registers of certain countries, with support provided, where necessary, by Swiss embassies abroad. If it is established that a trade mark application contains unlawful use of the Swiss cross and/or the “Switzerland” designation, the IPI will either directly raise an objection or inform the trade associations about it. The trade associations can also file opposition to the trade mark registration. For example, in 2018, this is how the IPI intervened in 85 cases in India (59 in previous year) against trade mark applications which contained illegal indications of Swiss origin.
The most success has been in the fight against wrongful use of the “Switzerland” brand in India where “Swissness” misuse is anchored in national law. This is also the case in China. The Chinese Trademark Office consistently rejects applications which contain wrongful use of the Swiss cross or the word “Swiss” as part of the trade mark. As a result of this change in Chinese trade mark registration practice, the IPI only had to intervene in 34 cases in China in 2018 (69 in previous year). The legal framework also allows for the confiscation and destruction of products which are wrongfully advertised as being “Swiss Made”. The bilateral dialogue with China, which culminates each year with a meeting in Beijing or Shanghai, is evidently bearing fruit.
Statistics on “Swissness” law enforcement in annual comparison
Further information on the role of the IPI in enforcing “Swissness”
24.05.2023 | Media release, Copyright
Online service providers are to remunerate use of journalistic works
26.04.2023 | Media release, Law and policy
Greater efficiency in the fight against counterfeiting
19.01.2023 | Law and policy, Event
Conference on Intellectual Property & Sustainability at the University of Geneva
Symposium: "Best practices in the fight against counterfeiting & piracy – NFTs not your cup of tea? Well, they should: NFTs as a new way of fighting counterfeiting and piracy"